LatestTrump Orders AI Data Centers to Return Energy Dividends to Host Communities
Sun, Oct 25, 2026Los AngelesNew YorkChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan FranciscoSeattleAtlantaBoston

Latest stories

  1. Trump Orders AI Data Centers to Return Energy Dividends to Host CommunitiesOct 24, 2026
  2. Amazon Halts Data Centers for HousingOct 24, 2026
  3. AI bots help Chinese hackers break into thousands of business networksOct 24, 2026
  4. Microsoft's AI Diagnostic Tool: Claims and Cost QuestionsOct 24, 2026
  5. Terafab production timeline: highly aspirationalOct 24, 2026

46.2 Percent: The Tax Rate London Banks Cite in Budget Push

Critics argue a key lobby group omitted Paris from its global tax comparison to strengthen its case against new levies before the upcoming budget.

By Jian Chen ·

UK Finance, the primary lobby group for major UK banks including Lloyds, JP Morgan, and Revolut, has sent a detailed letter to Chancellor John Healey urging caution on tax increases. The organization is relying on data from the accountancy firm PwC to argue that London already imposes one of the highest tax burdens on the global banking sector. By highlighting these figures, the group aims to convince the government that raising taxes in next week's budget could trigger a shift of jobs and business operations to other financial hubs.

The report used in the letter calculates a total tax rate of 46.2 percent for a large bank operating in London. This figure encompasses corporation tax, social security contributions, value added tax, and specific bank levies. The document compares London to four other major cities, stating that the UK capital exceeds Amsterdam at 42.2 percent, Frankfurt at 39.1 percent, Dublin at 29 percent, and New York at 27.9 percent. This data serves as the core of the lobbying effort to protect the status quo.

A significant question has emerged regarding the absence of Paris from these comparisons. Paris is a major competitor to London and hosts substantial operations for banks such as JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Barclays. Independent calculations reviewed by a leading accountancy firm indicate that a bank in Paris would face a total tax rate between 51.6 percent and 57.3 percent. This places the French capital up to 11.1 percentage points higher than London, a detail notably missing from the lobby's primary presentation.

UK Finance explained that it considered including Paris but could not generate a robust like-for-like figure using its specific model bank. The group maintained that retaining the same five cities allows for consistent comparisons over time. It also pointed out that in previous editions of the report, jurisdictions like Frankfurt showed higher total tax rates than the UK, suggesting the data is not static or purely selective.

Critics, however, view the omission of Paris as a strategic choice to protect bank profits ahead of the budget. Paul Nowak, the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, described the effort as a misleading attempt to argue against fair taxes. He stated that the data does not reflect the actual taxes paid by Britain's big banks, which he believes are likely lower than those of many international competitors. Nowak argued that the Chancellor has a duty to ask those benefiting from windfall profits to pay a fairer share, especially while millions struggle to make ends meet.

Simon Youel, head of policy and advocacy at Positive Money, raised further concerns about the report's methodology. He questioned whether Paris was cynically left out to allow the group to claim that the City of London contributes more tax than any other global financial sector. Youel expressed hope that the Chancellor would look past the lobbying and follow other countries in raising bank taxes to recoup profits generated by higher interest rates. The TUC has proposed that increasing the bank surcharge from 3 percent to 8 percent could raise 2.25 billion pounds per year.

Reactions from within the banking sector have been mixed. CS Venkatakrishnan, the chief executive of Barclays, told journalists on Thursday that the financial impact of a tax rise would be manageable. He offered the Chancellor his full support on the matter. In contrast, Jamie Dimon, the head of JP Morgan, warned in May that the bank could cancel plans for a new 3 billion pound London headquarters if Britain became hostile to the sector. Dimon met with Andy Burnham and Healey last month to warn that further levies could put investment and jobs at risk.

A Treasury spokesperson responded by stating that decisions on tax are a matter for the Chancellor to set out at fiscal events. The department noted that it does not routinely comment on rumors, speculation, or proposals. PwC has also been contacted for comment regarding the specific methodology used in the report. The final budget announcement is expected to clarify the government's stance on these levies next week.

Source: The Guardian

More Business · World news · Bad Service · Report a business

Get Headlines Wave in your inboxThe latest from the cities that shape the country. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Headlines Wave in your inboxThe latest from the cities that shape the country. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.